OSI

@OSIUnited

The Open Scholarship Initiative (OSI) is a diverse, inclusive, global network of high level experts working together to develop the future of open scholarship.

Seattle, WA
osiglobal.org
Придружио/ла се април 2016.
34 Фотографије и видео снимци Фотографије и видео снимци

Твитови

Блокирао/ла си корисника @OSIUnited

Да ли сигурно желиш да видиш ове твитове? Приказивање твитова неће одблокирати корисника @OSIUnited

  1. је ретвитовао/ла
    28. мај

    📅Last few days to apply for the : Sep 4–5, Cambridge, UK: don't miss this if you believe that , innovative products 💡and community effort 👨‍👩‍👧‍👦are key to improving the ways we consume and share research 🚀🌟

    21 ретвит 19 свиђања
    Опозови
  2. је ретвитовао/ла
    14. мај

    Today we launch a joint initiative with the European University Association () to improve scholarly research assessment methodologies ➡

    , , и 4 других
    2 66 ретвитови 96 свиђања
    Опозови
  3. је ретвитовао/ла
    24. апр

    If you're under the impression that "all publishers do is take articles from authors for free and then sell them back to the academy at a profit," please read this (and share it). via

    1 одговор 19 ретвитови 25 свиђања
    Опозови
  4. је ретвитовао/ла
    19. апр

    PLOS is evaluating alternatives for no-APC OA publishing.

    Одговор за корисника @RickyPo
    We have a few alternatives that we’re evaluating internally and with potential library partners right now. That will continue over the next few months ( recently joined us to accelerate work), and plan to launch no later than early fall.
    1 одговор 8 ретвитови 22 свиђања
    Опозови
  5. је ретвитовао/ла
    16. апр

    This might be more significant than those who have walked away. Elsevier agrees to a price cut!

    The French consortium Couperin signs a four-year agreement with Elsevier. [Google Translate] via
    Прикажи овај низ
    4 16 ретвитови 39 свиђања
    Прикажи овај низ
    Прикажи овај низ
    Опозови
  6. 9. апр

    JIFs are bad for scholcomm, but researchers still love ‘em. Not surprising. Frustrating though. Maybe we need to come up with a sugar-free JIF—great taste, fewer calories.

    From et al: "87% of institutions that mentioned the supported [its] use...while 13% of institutions expressed caution about [its] use....None of the RPT documents we analyzed heavily criticized the JIF or prohibited its use."
    1 одговор 1 ретвит 2 свиђања
    Опозови
  7. је ретвитовао/ла
    2. апр

    Court orders publisher OMICS to pay U.S. gov't $50 million in suit alleging "unfair and deceptive practices"

    1 одговор 13 ретвитови 11 свиђања
    Прикажи овај низ
    Прикажи овај низ
    Опозови
  8. 28. мар

    Fascinating---a must-read for all angst-ridden academics: WOS records "suggest that fewer than 10% of scientific articles are likely to remain uncited. But the true figure is probably even lower, because...uncited [articles] have actually been cited somewhere by someone."

    If I want to know how many papers remain uncited, would be the last source! The science that’s never been cited
    Опозови
  9. 28. мар

    Einstein, Planck, Curie, Bohr, Schrodinger, Rutherford, Thomson et al all wouldn't have qualified for this position in their early careers. Using publication metrics in RPT decisions is a problem that everyone recognizes. What to do about it is the $64k question.

    Spotted on a job advert. 🧐🤮😭 ping
    1 ретвит 3 свиђања
    Опозови
  10. је ретвитовао/ла
    25. мар

    "open access publishing accounts for over 40% of articles and was significantly associated with increased short-term citations": Open Access Publishing and Subsequent Citations Among Articles in Major Cardiovascular Journals

    8 ретвитови 13 свиђања
    Опозови
  11. 14. мар

    A new edition of OSI's report on Plan S is ready for review at . This edition includes a section examining how Plan S deals with green open access. Thank you to those who recommended adding this section.

    2ретвитова
    Опозови
  12. је ретвитовао/ла
    12. мар

    We shared this article on the list last week: . It speaks to the new normal in debate where we vilify people we disagree with. Of course, Jefferson and Hamilton debated this way too, but at least they produced tons of scholarship in the process.

    1 ретвит 1 свиђање
    Опозови
  13. је ретвитовао/ла
    12. мар

    By popular demand (or more accurately the unpopularity of tweets sent out under my work account ), I am thrilled to announce the launch of my new, destined to be immensely popular personal account. Expect 2-3 tweets per year, but they'll be really awesome.

    1 ретвит 11 свиђања
    Опозови
  14. 7. мар

    As if scholcomm didn't have enough problems already...

    “Universities require staff to publish several papers a year…If you bought your doctoral dissertation and struggle with teaching and administration loads, you will never be able to produce original research. But $15,000 will get you around that problem.”
    Опозови
  15. 7. мар

    Guest Post -- Leveling the Playing Field: How to Address Global Imbalances in Scholarly Communication via

    2ретвитова 1 свиђање
    Опозови
  16. је ретвитовао/ла
    7. мар

    Last week, the University of California terminated its license with Elsevier. Leakage has reduced the value of the big deal -- and publisher pricing power -- while empowering library negotiators, argues . via

    5 ретвитови 5 свиђања
    Опозови
  17. је ретвитовао/ла
    12. окт 2018.

    From our friends at . Paying for Open Access does not increase your paper's impact, but self-archiving in a repository does -

    11 ретвитови 10 свиђања
    Опозови
  18. је ретвитовао/ла
    7. мар

    THREAD: What should we make of Swedish funder Riksbankens Jubileumsfond having second thoughts about Plan S? Should its decision to pull back be viewed as a brave move, or does it reflect badly on them?

    Одговор за корисника @RickyPo
    Considering the national conversation, not surprising this happens in Sweden. Two thoughts: RJ is not a very big funder, so real effect apart from PR is relatively small; and second, this does not reflect well on RJ: if you are so unsure, don't sign in the first place.
    3 9 ретвитови 3 свиђања
    Опозови
  19. је ретвитовао/ла
    5. мар
    Одговор за корисника

    cc Note raw, unadulterated version here

    2ретвитова 3 свиђања
    Опозови
  20. 28. феб

    UC terminates subscriptions with Elsevier via

    Опозови

@OSIUnited још увек није твитовао/ла.

Учитавање ће потрајати.

Твитер је можда премашио капацитет или је тренутно наишао на проблем. Покушај поново или посети статус Твитера за више информација.

    Можда ће ти се свидети

    ·